ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2026
Evaluating the efficacy of disinfecting products against Bacillus subtilis spore using an optimized method.
Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Twenty disinfectant products were evaluated for sporicidal activity using an optimized method. Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051 was sporulated in Difco sporulation medium for 3 days. The spores were purified using density centrifugation and heat treatment and then prepared for sporicidal efficacy assessment. The quality of the purified spores was verified using sodium hypochlorite solutions with free chlorine concentrations of 1,500 and 5,000 ppm. The active ingredients in disinfectant products included chlorine, hydrogen peroxide/peracetic acid, aldehydes, quaternary ammonium compounds, and phenols. Of the 20 products tested, 6 met the effectiveness criterion of greater than a 5 log₁₀ reduction after exposure of B. subtilis spores for the label-recommended contact time. Among the 11 products claiming sporicidal activity, 4 met the established criterion. Among the five categories of active ingredients evaluated, some chlorine-based and hydrogen peroxide/peracetic acid-based products demonstrated significantly higher sporicidal activity than products in the other three categories. Overall, products that did not meet the study criteria exhibited less than a 1 log₁₀ reduction. When these underperforming sporicidal products were tested with an extended contact time of 10 min, one additional product met the effectiveness criterion. Subsequent quality assessments using freshly prepared, laboratory-made products containing identical active ingredients demonstrated improved sporicidal efficacy compared with the original test items, indicating that defects or degradation of active ingredients may have occurred in some of the tested commercial disinfectant products. One sentence summary Evaluation of 20 disinfectants against Bacillus subtilis spores using optimized methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.