ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2026
Occurrence of Infusion Associated Reactions and Antidrug Antibodies in Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Fabry Disease and the Effect of Preventive Measures.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occurrence of Infusion Associated Reactions and Antidrug Antibodies in Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Fabry Disease and the Effect of Preventive Measures.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male patients with the classical phenotype of Fabry disease (FD) are at risk of developing inhibiting antidrug antibodies (iADAs) against recombinant α-galactosidase-A, administered in the form of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). The presence of ADAs is linked to infusion-associated reactions (IARs) and reduced ERT effectiveness. This study evaluates the incidence of iADAs and IARs in ERT treated classical male FD patients, their interrelatedness and the effect of an adjusted ERT initiation protocol, aimed at inducing immune tolerance. In this monocenter cohort study, a retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the occurrence of iADAs and IARs. Prospectively, a stepwise dose escalation ERT initiation protocol was evaluated in classical male FD patients with a calculated high risk of iADA formation and compared to the standard initiation protocol. Retrospectively (n = 52), the proportion of patients experiencing IARs was higher in patients that developed iADAs (20/27 seropositive patients, 0/19 seronegative, p < 0.001). Higher iADA titers were associated with persisting iADA titers (p = 0.004). Prospectively (n = 17), none of the patients in the intervention group (stepwise dose escalation) experienced IARs (0/8), compared to half of the patients in the control group (5/9, p = 0.029). The proportion of patients developing iADAs was not different between the two groups (respectively, 4/8 and 6/9, p = 0.52). To conclude, iADA development is associated with the occurrence of IARs. The stepwise dose escalation at ERT initiation used in the current study in a single cohort seems to prevent IARs in male patients with classical FD, but does not seem to prevent iADA development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.