ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Development and validation of a rapid 15-minute gastric ultrasound protocol for suspected gastroparesis: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Ultrasound and Scintigraphy in Gastric Emptying: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) is the reference standard for gastroparesis but is limited by time, cost, and accessibility. We aimed to validate a practical 15-minute gastric ultrasonography (GUS) threshold for early assessment of suspected gastroparesis. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study comparing GUS with GES. Participants were divided into training and validation cohorts by enrollment date. Using 4-hour GES as reference, the optimal GUS cut-off was derived by ROC analysis in the training cohort and tested in the validation cohort. Reproducibility and associations with symptom severity were assessed.
resultsOf 123 participants screened, 113 completed both GUS and GES (training, n = 67; validation, n = 46). GUS
conclusionsA GUS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.