Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622279›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2026

Radial Distribution Function in a Two-Dimensional Core-Shoulder Particle System.

Michael Wassermair, Gerhard Kahl, Andrew J Archer, Roland Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael WassermairInstitut für Theoretische Physik, TU Wien , Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, A-1040Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard KahlInstitut für Theoretische Physik, TU Wien , Wiedner Hauptstraße 8-10, A-1040Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4375-4684
Andrew J ArcherDepartment of Mathematical Sciences and Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical Modelling, Loughborough University, LoughboroughLE11 3TU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4706-2204
Roland RothInstitute for Theoretical Physics, University of Tübingen, D-72076Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6271-7646

Funding

Austrian Science Fund PIN8759524Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/P015689/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important quantity in liquid state theory is the radial distribution function g(r). It can be calculated within the framework of classical density functional theory in two very distinct ways. In the test-particle route, one fixes a single fluid particle, turning it into an external potential in which the inhomogeneous structure of the fluid is calculated by minimizing the functional. The second route to g(r) in density functional theory employs the Ornstein-Zernike equation and the pair direct correlation function, that can be obtained from the second functional derivatives of the excess (over the ideal gas) free energy functional. Since typically an approximate excess free energy functional is employed, the test-particle route, which requires only one functional derivative, is more accurate than the Ornstein-Zernike route. Here we study a two-dimensional core-shoulder particle system and find that in some circumstances the results from the Ornstein-Zernike route can be comparable in accuracy to the test-particle results for r > σ, the core diameter. We also examine in detail the asymptotic r → ∞ decay of g(r), finding a variety of possible decay wavelengths at different state points and state points where there is a crossover from one wavelength to a very different one. This behavior is a signature pointing to the rich phase behavior of the incipient solid phases.

Identifiers

PMID42622279
PMCPMC13501884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.