ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2026
Calibration, Validation and Utility of ARTEMIS-A: A Web Application for Early Identification of Mental Health Difficulties in Secondary Schools.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification can accelerate access to effective support. We aimed to calibrate and validate ARTEMIS-A, a computerised adaptive assessment of mental health difficulties for young people (YP), and to explore its acceptability and feasibility.
methodThe ARTEMIS-A item bank comprises 175 questions from established standardised mental health measures. Calibration involved pupils aged 11-16 years completing overlapping sets of 40 questions. Convergent validity was evaluated by comparing calibrated ARTEMIS-A scores with the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA). Online interviews with YP, parents and school staff explored perceived benefits and harms.
resultsOf 3183 recruited pupils from nine schools, 2276 provided complete calibration data. Then 103 YP from six schools completed both ARTEMIS-A and the DAWBA. ARTEMIS-A administered a median of four questions per participant (min 2, max 8), with a median completion time of 67 seconds. Convergent validity with clinically rated DSM 5 DAWBA diagnoses was good; correlation was 0.55 the area under the curve was 0.81. Parents and YP considered ARTEMIS-A acceptable and feasible, highlighting its speed, simplicity, and device flexibility.
conclusionsARTEMIS-A is potentially an efficient, flexible and cost-effective method of early identification of secondary school pupils who may require additional support for their mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.