ReviewSaudi journal of medicine & medical sciences
Determinants of Successful Pectus Carinatum Bracing: A Narrative Review.
Review in Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pectus carinatum (PC) is a chest wall deformity characterized by the anterior projection of the sternum that typically manifests in adolescence and may result in notable psychosocial morbidity despite insubstantial physiological signs. Historically considered less common than pectus excavatum, recent trends suggest that PC may be underdiagnosed, with increasing recognition and referrals to specialized pectus clinics. The main objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of bracing, particularly the dynamic compression system, in the non-surgical management of PC. Traditionally, a surgical condition, PC is currently being treated more often with dynamic compression bracing, especially in younger, more flexible chest wall patients. This evidence-based review aims to analyze the optimal time to start bracing, using current literature on anatomical correction, compliance, and psychosocial outcomes. It is known that early treatment, ideally at the pre-pubertal or early pubertal stage, can result in better-bracing success, shorter treatment time, and more favorable cosmetic and emotional outcomes. The key determinants of treatment effectiveness are age, severity of deformity at the start of treatment, pressure limits, brace type, and patient cooperation. Further, physiotherapy and psychosocial support have been found to have a positive impact on adherence and quality of life. However, there is no standard protocol for bracing. As outlined in this review, the proposed solution is a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach that combines clinical timing and personalized care to develop feasible guidelines for effective and timely bracing in adolescents with pectus carinatum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.