ArticleRSC advances2026
µORScreen: a lightweight consensus modeling framework for µ-opioid receptor ligand prediction and virtual screening.
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a major public health challenge, and the human µ-opioid receptor (µOR) is a central target in opioid pharmacology. Here, we report a reproducible ligand-based workflow for µOR antagonist classification named µORScreen which integrates rigorous split design, systematic model benchmarking, interpretation, virtual screening and lightweight local deployment. A curated set of 982 human µOR ligands was partitioned under three complementary strategies (similarity-based, scaffold-based, and random-based), each with a held-out test set and five train/validation folds. On the test evaluation, LightGBM (ECFP4 with RDKit 2D descriptors) generalized best (AUROC 0.714), closely followed by TabPFN (0.705) and Random Forest (0.696). The three top-ranked models were combined into a consensus classifier that prioritized unanimously predicted compounds as high-confidence antagonist-like candidates. Applied to GPCRdb, ZINC, REINVENT, and OUROBOROS, µORScreen revealed pronounced source dependence, with the strongest enrichment of antagonist-like candidates in GPCRdb. On an independent set of 17 non-overlapping, literature-derived ligands (10 antagonists, 7 non-antagonists), the consensus achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.68. SHAP analysis attributed predictions to a concentrated subset of fingerprint features, and the workflow was deployed as a web server supporting SMILES-based prediction and RF-based SHAP analysis. µORScreen thus provides a computationally efficient, openly accessible framework for early-stage µOR ligand prioritization and external-library triage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.