Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622005›Full record

ArticleSmall science2026

Moment-Equivalent Adhesion Statistics Inferred From Particle Resuspension Kinetics.

Roy Almog, Ziv Klausner, Ronen Berkovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roy AlmogDepartment of Chemical Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva Israel.
Ziv KlausnerDepartment of Applied Mathematics Israel Institute for Biological Research Ness-Ziona Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-2006
Ronen BerkovichDepartment of Chemical Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0989-6136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particle resuspension from surfaces is a fundamental process in many chemical engineering systems, including aerosol dispersion, powder processing, filtration, contamination control, and environmental dispersion. Accurate prediction of resuspension requires knowledge of particle-surface adhesion statistics, yet direct adhesion measurements are often technically demanding and strongly system-dependent. Here, a data-driven framework based on an augmented Rock'n'Roll (RnR) model is developed to reconstruct adhesion-force statistics from resuspension measurements. The present approach integrates a flexible bounded beta distribution into the RnR framework, allowing adhesion heterogeneity to be reconstructed without restricting the distribution to a lognormal form. It is shown here that this enables a robust, percentile-resolved reconstruction of adhesion statistics that remain mechanically consistent with rolling detachment physics and aerodynamic forcing. Implementing this approach across multiple datasets and particle systems, the reconstructed adhesion percentiles were found to exhibit a systematic aerodynamic scaling when normalized by the rolling lever-arm ratio. This reflects the linear contribution of rolling in the moment balance and serves as an internal consistency check of the inverse reconstruction. These results indicate that resuspension percentiles encode quantitative information about particle-surface adhesion interactions. By isolating the mechanically relevant resistance to rolling detachment, the proposed method infers adhesion statistics without direct adhesion experiments.

Indexed as

adhesion forcesaerodynamic forcesresuspensionRock‘n’Roll model

Identifiers

PMID42622005
PMCPMC13489309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.