Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621988›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis of Shark-Related Injuries on a Pediatric Scope.

Jana Raphael, Khalil Davis, Balagangadhar Totapally, Patricio E Lau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jana RaphaelTrauma, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, USA.
Khalil DavisTrauma, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, USA.
Balagangadhar TotapallyPediatric Critical Care, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, USA.
Patricio E LauPediatric Surgery, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Shark-related injuries (SRIs) in children are rare events but can result in significant morbidity due to the force and mechanism of shark bites. As coastal water use increases globally, shark-human interactions are becoming more common, creating new challenges for trauma systems and clinical management. Methods This retrospective observational study used the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to characterize the frequency, injury patterns, severity, and clinical outcomes of pediatric SRIs in patients aged zero to 16 years from 2017 to 2021. Demographics, injury location, injury severity, hospital course, and operative interventions were analyzed. Results Among 520,795 pediatric trauma records, 26 cases (0.005%) were SRIs with a median age of 12 years and predominantly males (73.1%). Injuries most commonly affected the lower extremities (65.4%), followed by upper extremities (26.9%) and combined extremity injuries (7.7%). Surgical intervention was required in 25 of 26 patients, totaling 120 procedures, most commonly soft tissue operations (65.8%), followed by orthopedic (30%) and neurovascular (4.1%) procedures. The median Injury Severity Score was 5, and the median hospital length of stay was three days. Seven patients (28%) required ICU care. No in-hospital mortality occurred.  Conclusion SRIs in children remain rare. Despite generally low injury severity with short ICU and hospital stay, nearly all cases required surgical intervention primarily for soft tissue-related intervention, followed by orthopedic procedures. These findings highlight important considerations for trauma care in pediatric SRIs.

Indexed as

national trauma data bankoperative managementpediatric surgerypediatric traumashark-related injuries

Identifiers

PMID42621988
PMCPMC13489545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.