ArticleBiochemia medica2026
Spurious life-threatening hypermagnesemia caused by a preanalytical error in an intensive care unit: a case report.
Article in Biochemia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate measurement of electrolytes is essential in critically ill patients. Magnesium (Mg) concentrations are particularly vulnerable to preanalytical errors, which may lead to life-threatening misinterpretation. A 57-year-old woman was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to acute decompensated heart failure and atrial fibrillation. On the second day of ICU hospitalization, serum samples analyzed in the emergency laboratory revealed critically low sodium (Na), potassium (K), and chloride (Cl) concentrations, accompanied by extremely elevated Mg concentrations that were considered incompatible with life. Given the discrepancy between life-threateningly high Mg concentrations and the patient's stable clinical condition, as confirmed by clinicians, who reported no signs of hyporeflexia, respiratory depression, or other symptoms of Mg toxicity, the laboratory medicine professional (LMP) initiated urgent communication with the clinical staff and recommended repeating the blood draw and all analyses. A reflex glucose measurement revealed a markedly elevated concentration (55.4 mmol/L), indicating contamination with a glucose infusion. The repeated analysis showed Mg and other electrolyte concentrations within reference ranges. Further investigation confirmed that blood sampling had been performed from the same arm and venous catheter through which infusion was being administered. The abnormal laboratory findings were explained by a preanalytical error caused by blood sampling during active infusion. This case emphasizes the importance of appropriate documentation of ongoing intravenous therapy and blood sampling conditions, as well as communication between the LMP and clinical staff. Awareness of preanalytical variables is essential to prevent misinterpretation of laboratory results and inappropriate patient treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.