Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621947›Full record

ArticleJournal of CME2026

Implementing Advisory Councils to Strengthen Continuing Education Programming: Case Study and Synthesised Recommendations.

Ariel Porto, Rosemary Motz, Karen Ashley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of CME, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ariel PortoWeitzman Institute, Moses/Weitzman Health System, Middletown, CT, USA.
Rosemary MotzWeitzman Institute, Moses/Weitzman Health System, Middletown, CT, USA.
Karen AshleyWeitzman Institute, Moses/Weitzman Health System, Middletown, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuing education (CE) activities that are multicomponent, long-term, interprofessional, or geographically dispersed require thorough mechanisms to meet the educational needs of learners. One tool offering a variety of benefits for complex CE programming is the formation of an advisory council, but there is a gap in the literature detailing how to most effectively implement councils to inform CE. Through the lens of a five-year, rural health telementoring project, this paper's purpose is to propose best practices for utilising CE councils by translating existing best practices from other health fields into actionable recommendations for CE providers. An intentional, phased approach to council development is recommended, including: (1) clearly defining the council's purpose and revising this purpose throughout the project; (2) thoughtfully recruiting members by determining key, needed characteristics; (3) deliberately planning and structuring meetings through a collaborative, team approach; and (4) effectively evaluating the council to support continuous improvement. Collectively, these practices support the development of councils that foster collaboration between project staff and council members to meaningfully improve CE. Although additional research is needed to examine the impact of councils on CE, the approaches described provide a practical foundation for CE programmes seeking to establish or strengthen councils - positioning councils as valuable partners in continuous program improvement.

Indexed as

Advisory councilseducational needsinterprofessional continuing educationProject ECHOrural health

Identifiers

PMID42621947
PMCPMC13488504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.