ArticleJAAD international2026
Detection of basal cell carcinoma on whole-slide images from Mohs micrographic surgery using weakly supervised learning.
Article in JAAD international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for treating aggressive basal cell carcinoma, but its success depends on expertise in intraoperative interpretation of frozen sections. Objective: To develop weakly supervised, multiple instance learning framework using a pathology foundation model for automated basal cell carcinoma detection in MMS frozen sections. Methods: An internal data set of 995 frozen MMS whole-slide images was slide-level labeled as tumor (512) or no tumor (483). Furthermore, tumor regions in the test set were annotated. Whole-slide images were tiled and encoded with Prov-Gigapath features for a weakly supervised multiple instance learning framework. The performance was evaluated as binary slide-level classification and in attention maps showing the localization of the tumor regions prior to validation on 2 external data sets. Results: The model showed near-perfect diagnostic performance, achieving 97.0% accuracy, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.998 on the internal data set. Furthermore, attention maps visualized diagnostically relevant regions, enhancing model interpretability (Intersection-over-Union = 0.41 ± 0.046 [Dice 0.58 ± 0.046]). External validation confirmed robust performance (90% to 92% accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.92-0.95). Limitations: The absence of tumor region annotations on external data sets. Conclusion: These findings support the feasibility of artificial intelligence-assisted analysis of MMS frozen sections and justify prospective studies evaluating its integration into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.