ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Private Hospital Anesthesia Rotation in A Rural Clinical School: A Pilot Study of Medical Students' Perceptions of One-To-One Supervision.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical exposure to anesthesia in rural undergraduate medical training is often limited. Therefore, a private hospital anesthesia rotation was implemented to maintain and enhance perioperative learning in rural clinical schools. Methods: Anesthesia rotation was established at a regional private hospital, incorporating one-to-one supervision by a consultant anesthetist. This was intentionally aligned with the principles of cognitive apprenticeship and situated learning, emphasizing learning through guided participation, observation, and direct engagement in authentic clinical tasks. Students observed perioperative care, airway management, anesthetic planning, and intraoperative decision-making. The program evaluation used anonymous questionnaires. Likert-type scale responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and grouped across thematic educational domains. Results: Seven out of eight participants completed the questionnaire (87.5%). The mean score across all survey items (4.7 out of 5; SD = 0.3) indicated consistently positive responses among participants. Overall agreement across survey items was 92%. Students reported clear agreement across domains related to supervision, learning environment, and clinical learning. Only one neutral response occurred in the domain "assessing increased interest in anesthesia as a career". Conclusion: By enhancing students' learning experiences and clinical exposure within a rural setting, initiatives such as this may strengthen rural medical education. Although this study did not assess career intentions or workforce outcomes, positive learning experiences may influence future rural practice decisions. Larger multicenter studies using objective educational outcomes across multiple training sites are needed to evaluate the effectiveness, generalizability, and reproducibility of this model and its potential influence on future rural practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.