ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Navigating constrained training participation: a grounded theory of training avoidance among Chinese college football student-athletes.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Training avoidance in sport is often interpreted through a deficit lens, yet little is known about how athletes regulate participation when leaving a team is institutionally costly. This study examined training avoidance within Chinese college football as a form of constrained participation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 Chinese college football student-athletes, all admitted through the Sports Special Admission policy. Data were analyzed using Straussian grounded theory procedures, including iterative theoretical sampling, constant comparison, open, axial, and selective coding, and negative-case analysis. Results: The analysis generated Navigating Constrained Training Participation as the core category. Four causal conditions shaped training avoidance: Status Marginalization Pressure, Inter-Role Conflict, Informal Power Oppression, and Asymmetrical Rule Enforcement. Athletes responded through a flexible, context-dependent repertoire of Covert Energy Conservation, Psychological Defense, Legitimation Maneuvering, and Overt Resistance. These strategies were not a fixed progression; athletes combined, revisited, or abandoned them as perceived risk, bodily capacity, available justifications, and coach relations changed. The process provided short-term protection while potentially contributing to longer-term erosion of skill, belonging, and participation. Discussion: Training avoidance is better understood not as an individual moral deficit but as a systemically produced and structurally conditioned adaptation. The model clarifies how athletes exercise constrained agency and offers a transferable explanation for sport-education systems in which exit is costly and participation is tied to educational opportunities, grading, resources, or status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.