Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621938›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Experiences of parents and adolescents throughout the solid-organ transplantation process: a focus group study.

Jessica Garrido-Bolton, Rocío de la Vega, María Fe Bravo-Ortiz, Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05441436 (Identification of Needs and Neuropsychological and Biopsychosocial Evolution in the Pre/Post-transplant and 6-month Follow-up Phases in Pediatric Population), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05441436 unknown statusnot on this map

Identification of Needs and Neuropsychological and Biopsychosocial Evolution in the Pre/Post-transplant and 6-month Follow-up Phases in Pediatric Population (the TransplantKIDS Mental Health Project)

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Universitario La PazRan2022 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsTransplant-Related DisorderArmsAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Solid organ transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica Garrido-BoltonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío de la VegaDepartment of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
María Fe Bravo-OrtizHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain.
Eduardo Fernández-JiménezDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Solid-organ transplantation is the optimal treatment for children and adolescents with end-stage organ failure. However, the biopsychosocial challenges faced jointly by this paediatric population have received little attention. This study is one of the few qualitative studies based on focus groups to identify the unmet care needs perceived by transplanted adolescents and parents of paediatric transplant recipients throughout the pre-, peri-, and post-surgical phases of various types of solid-organ transplantation. Methods: Qualitative data was collected using a purposive sample selected according to the concept of information power at the Children's Hospital of La Paz University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). The adolescent dataset comprised one focus group with four adolescent transplant recipients and one additional participant who completed an individual in-depth interview using the same interview guide. The parent dataset consisted of one focus group with five parents of paediatric transplant recipients. A biopsychosocial theoretical framework and semi-structured moderating guide were used. Participants first answered open-ended questions about desired healthcare improvements, followed by targeted questions on biomedical, psychological, and social issues that were not spontaneously addressed. No further focus groups with additional participants were required, as theoretical sufficiency had been attained. Thematic framework analysis was used to examine the data, involving familiarisation, identifying a thematic framework, indexing, charting, mapping, and interpretation. Finally, the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) were followed. Results: Significant unmet care needs were identified throughout the transplantation process, particularly in the social and psychological domains. Participants reported concerns regarding long travel distances to hospitals, extended waiting times for outpatient visits, limited access to academic support, and insufficient peer and family support. The need for a designated social work contact person, compassionate healthcare interactions, and consistent access to mental health care was also highlighted. Conclusion: The findings will guide the development of prehabilitation programs and longitudinal support interventions for solid-organ transplant patients and their families, emphasising the need to understand their experiences and unmet needs to enhance healthcare and clinical outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: The study protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05441436). De-identified individual participant data will be made available in the

Indexed as

biopsychosocial modelfocus groupssolid-organ transplantationthematic framework analysistransplanted adolescents and parentsunmet care needs

Identifiers

PMID42621938
PMCPMC13488533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.