Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621913›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T air2026

Understanding the Temporal Evolution of Isoprene Organosulfates Using a Novel Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography Method.

Ping Liu, Daniel J Bryant, Carys Williams, Rhianna L Evans, James R Hopkins, Sri H Budisulistiorini, Michael Flynn, Nathan A I Watson, James D Allan, W Joe F Acton and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T air, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ping LiuState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Daniel J BryantWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6605-6136
Carys WilliamsWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.
Rhianna L EvansWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.
James R HopkinsWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.
Sri H BudisulistioriniWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5715-9157
Michael FlynnDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.
Nathan A I WatsonDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.
James D AllanDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-4876
W Joe F ActonSchool of Geography Earth and Environmental Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-3399
William J BlossSchool of Geography Earth and Environmental Science, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-4461
Connor PriorDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, U.K.
William UnsworthDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-5156
Xiang DingState Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-1879
Andrew R RickardWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-3471
Jacqueline F HamiltonWolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0975-4311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organosulfates (OSs) form a significant component of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the atmosphere. Previously, their measurement using reversed-phase liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (RPLC-HRMS) has led to poor retention and significant matrix effects. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) provides improved retention of polar OSs, such as those formed from isoprene oxidation, and reduced matrix effects. Studies employing HILIC predominantly use gradient elution to separate OSs with varying polarities. HILIC, however, is very sensitive to changes in the water layer within the column, which facilitates separation, meaning the column needs to be thoroughly equilibrated before each injection, significantly increasing analysis time, cost, and solvent waste. The work presented here describes the development of an isocratic HILIC method to analyze OSs in complex ambient PM

Indexed as

HILICisopreneorbitrap mass spectrometryorganosulfatesecondary organic aerosol

Identifiers

PMID42621913
PMCPMC13488277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.