ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Comparison of the Bond Strength of Primary Molar Bands to Zirconia and Stainless-Steel Crowns Following Sandblasting and Application of Different Cements.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Bond Strength of Primary Molar Bands to Zirconia and Stainless-Steel Crowns Following Sandblasting and Application of Different Cements.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study compared the bond strength of primary molar bands to zirconia crowns (ZCs) and stainless-steel crowns (SSCs) following sandblasting and application of glass ionomer (GI) and self-adhesive resin cements. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study was conducted on 48 monolithic ZCs and 48 primary mandibular second molar SSCs mounted in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin in cylindrical molds. Orthodontic wire was used to create a 70-mm U-shaped loop soldered to the mid-buccal and mid-lingual surfaces perpendicular to the occlusal surface. The specimens were assigned to 8 groups for the bonding of sandblasted and non-sandblasted bands to SSCs and ZCs with GI and self-adhesive resin cement. After the interventions and incubation in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 h, the specimens were thermo-cycled (5000 cycles), and their bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine (1 mm/minute). Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA (alpha = 0.05). Results: The bond strength was the highest in the sandblasted band bonded to SSC with resin cement and the lowest in the non-sandblasted band bonded to ZC with GI. Irrespective of crown type, resin cement yielded a significantly higher bond strength than GI ( Conclusion: The bond strength provided by resin cement was significantly higher than GI cement. Sandblasting of the band significantly increased the bond strength, but the effect of crown type on the bond strength was not significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.