ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Cortical Tracking of Speech Across Rhythm Classes in English-, French-, and Japanese-Learning 4- and 8-Month-Old Infants.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cortical Tracking of Speech Across Rhythm Classes in English-, French-, and Japanese-Learning 4- and 8-Month-Old Infants.Developmental science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has been proposed that the world's languages fall into three rhythmic classes according to the units that determine their rhythmic structure: stress-based (e.g., English), syllable-based (e.g., French), and mora-based (e.g., Japanese). These rhythmic differences modulate language-specific processing in adults and young infants. It has also been proposed that the syllable is the default rhythmic unit across languages, more prominent in acquisition and processing. This study investigated the development of these language-specific versus language-general effects on the neural processing of speech, focusing on cortical tracking at frequency bands potentially corresponding to three rhythmic units (2.5 Hz/foot, 5 Hz/syllable, 10 Hz/mora). We assessed cortical tracking in 119 infants belonging to one of three native-language groups: English, French, and Japanese, and two age groups: 4 and 8 months. Infants heard CVN (consonant-vowel-nasal) syllable strings synthesized using a native-language voice in their respective native language, a non-native voice (Polish), and a non-speech (vocoded) version of the non-native voice stimuli. In all conditions, the stimuli consisted of 100-ms morae, combining into 200-ms syllables, combining into 400-ms bisyllabic feet. In all three language groups and at both ages, results showed (1) efficient cortical tracking at 5 and 10 Hz, but inconsistent tracking at 2.5 Hz; (2) stronger tracking at 5 Hz, and (3) differential tracking of speech and non-speech stimuli. These findings establish that language-general rhythmic processing guides cortical tracking, that the cross-linguistic syllabic level is dominant until at least 8 months, and that speech stimuli are processed differently than non-speech stimuli by at least 4 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.