Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621832›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2026

Cortical Tracking of Speech Across Rhythm Classes in English-, French-, and Japanese-Learning 4- and 8-Month-Old Infants.

Varghese Peter, Marina Kalashnikova, Sandrien van Ommen, Reiko Mazuka, Denis Burnham, Thierry Nazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Varghese PeterMARCS Institute for Brain Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4007-507X
Marina KalashnikovaBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Guipuzcoa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7924-8687
Sandrien van OmmenUniversité Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8311-2774
Reiko MazukaRIKEN, Center for Brain Science, Saitama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-7768
Denis BurnhamMARCS Institute for Brain Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1980-3458
Thierry NazziUniversité Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-3661

Funding

ANR-DFGAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Dynamics of LanguageJSPS for Specially Promoted ResearchJSPS grant-in-aid for Scientific ResearchLABEX EFLMEXT grant for Innovative Areas
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been proposed that the world's languages fall into three rhythmic classes according to the units that determine their rhythmic structure: stress-based (e.g., English), syllable-based (e.g., French), and mora-based (e.g., Japanese). These rhythmic differences modulate language-specific processing in adults and young infants. It has also been proposed that the syllable is the default rhythmic unit across languages, more prominent in acquisition and processing. This study investigated the development of these language-specific versus language-general effects on the neural processing of speech, focusing on cortical tracking at frequency bands potentially corresponding to three rhythmic units (2.5 Hz/foot, 5 Hz/syllable, 10 Hz/mora). We assessed cortical tracking in 119 infants belonging to one of three native-language groups: English, French, and Japanese, and two age groups: 4 and 8 months. Infants heard CVN (consonant-vowel-nasal) syllable strings synthesized using a native-language voice in their respective native language, a non-native voice (Polish), and a non-speech (vocoded) version of the non-native voice stimuli. In all conditions, the stimuli consisted of 100-ms morae, combining into 200-ms syllables, combining into 400-ms bisyllabic feet. In all three language groups and at both ages, results showed (1) efficient cortical tracking at 5 and 10 Hz, but inconsistent tracking at 2.5 Hz; (2) stronger tracking at 5 Hz, and (3) differential tracking of speech and non-speech stimuli. These findings establish that language-general rhythmic processing guides cortical tracking, that the cross-linguistic syllabic level is dominant until at least 8 months, and that speech stimuli are processed differently than non-speech stimuli by at least 4 months.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexLanguage DevelopmentLearningSpeechSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInfantMalecortical trackingcrosslinguisticEnglish/French/Japaneseinfancylinguistic rhythmspeech/nonspeech

Identifiers

PMID42621832
PMCPMC13491566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.