ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Educators, Not Influencers: Health Content Creator Perspectives on Research Recruitment Collaboration.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextMedical mistrust and delayed diagnoses drive patients to seek information outside of formal healthcare channels, meaning that traditional research recruitment methods then struggle to reach them. Social media health content creators with large followings possess an established online community presence and trust that could address this recruitment gap.
objectiveTo investigate how influential women's health content creators define their role, make decisions about content sharing, and evaluate research recruitment collaboration opportunities. This study aimed to understand how researchers can optimise study recruitment via influencer mechanisms.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 women's health influencers across 11 countries, in English, French, German and Italian. Influencer follower counts ranged from 1300 to over 700,000. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsSix themes emerged: (1) Educators, not influencers; (2) mission as motivation; (3) leveraging reach; (4) care-centred gatekeeping; (5) values-led reciprocity; and (6) collaboration beyond logistics. Themes were examined against established influencer theories of Source Credibility, Similarity-Attraction, and Social Exchange, which operated at both influencer-follower and researcher-influencer relationship levels. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsHealth content creators function as mission-driven educators and careful gatekeepers who evaluate research opportunities against very specific criteria aligned with their own values. Their credibility, expertise, and shared experiences with followers have the potential to enable health behaviour change among their audience. They desire genuine research partnerships with early engagement and recognition of expertise. Strategic partnership models should therefore position creators as valuable collaborators in study design and recruitment rather than as advertising channels alone. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was conducted in collaboration with Live UTI Free Ltd., a patient-led research and advocacy organisation. All the researchers have lived experience of recurrent or chronic UTI and other conditions within the focus of the study. Patient researchers co-led all study stages: design, interview guide development, data collection, and analysis. Their lived experiences of seeking health information online about underserved conditions was essential for understanding how health content creators connect with online patient communities. Patient researchers conducted multilingual interviews and provided critical interpretation of findings. Members of the broader patient community identified health content creators as suitable interview participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.