Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621796›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Educators, Not Influencers: Health Content Creator Perspectives on Research Recruitment Collaboration.

Melissa L Kramer, Bianca Serio, Aileen K Ho, Katherine A Finlay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa L KramerSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5203
Bianca SerioLive UTI Free Ltd., Dublin, Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Aileen K HoSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2581-126X
Katherine A FinlaySchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-2652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMedical mistrust and delayed diagnoses drive patients to seek information outside of formal healthcare channels, meaning that traditional research recruitment methods then struggle to reach them. Social media health content creators with large followings possess an established online community presence and trust that could address this recruitment gap.

objectiveTo investigate how influential women's health content creators define their role, make decisions about content sharing, and evaluate research recruitment collaboration opportunities. This study aimed to understand how researchers can optimise study recruitment via influencer mechanisms.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 women's health influencers across 11 countries, in English, French, German and Italian. Influencer follower counts ranged from 1300 to over 700,000. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsSix themes emerged: (1) Educators, not influencers; (2) mission as motivation; (3) leveraging reach; (4) care-centred gatekeeping; (5) values-led reciprocity; and (6) collaboration beyond logistics. Themes were examined against established influencer theories of Source Credibility, Similarity-Attraction, and Social Exchange, which operated at both influencer-follower and researcher-influencer relationship levels. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsHealth content creators function as mission-driven educators and careful gatekeepers who evaluate research opportunities against very specific criteria aligned with their own values. Their credibility, expertise, and shared experiences with followers have the potential to enable health behaviour change among their audience. They desire genuine research partnerships with early engagement and recognition of expertise. Strategic partnership models should therefore position creators as valuable collaborators in study design and recruitment rather than as advertising channels alone. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was conducted in collaboration with Live UTI Free Ltd., a patient-led research and advocacy organisation. All the researchers have lived experience of recurrent or chronic UTI and other conditions within the focus of the study. Patient researchers co-led all study stages: design, interview guide development, data collection, and analysis. Their lived experiences of seeking health information online about underserved conditions was essential for understanding how health content creators connect with online patient communities. Patient researchers conducted multilingual interviews and provided critical interpretation of findings. Members of the broader patient community identified health content creators as suitable interview participants.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPatient SelectionSocial MediaAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMotivationResearch PersonnelTrustWomen's Healthcontent creatorsdigital healthhealth influencersonline health communitiesresearch participationresearch recruitmentwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID42621796
PMCPMC13491538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.