Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621665›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2026

Recent feeding history drives prediction of daily feed intake in lactating sows.

Maria Victoria Souza, Alex Batista Trentin, Qianqian Huang, Hinayah Rojas de Oliveira, Brian Richert, Luiz Fernando Brito, Hyatt Frobose, Allan Schinckel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Victoria SouzaDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5015-6108
Alex Batista TrentinDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Qianqian HuangDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Hinayah Rojas de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Brian RichertDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Luiz Fernando BritoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5819-0922
Hyatt FroboseJyga Technologies Inc-GESTAL, St-Lambert-de-Lauzon, Quebec G0S 2W0, Canada.
Allan SchinckelDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-7198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of feed intake (FI) in lactating sows is essential for precision nutrition, welfare monitoring, and sustainable production. Feed intake during lactation is influenced by both physiological and environmental factors, but the complexity of individual FI makes traditional modeling approaches challenging. Machine learning (ML) provides flexible tools for capturing nonlinear dynamics in sow-feeding datasets. This study evaluated multiple ML algorithms to predict and forecast FI using 17,171 daily observations from 898 lactating sows. Five ML algorithms were tested: Generalized Additive Model (GAM), Elastic Net Regression (ENET), Random Forest (RDF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGB). Predictors included environmental variables (daily maximum air temperature and daily maximum dew point), biological variables (parity and lactation day), and historical data derived from recent FI events (moving averages, lag variables, and intake variability), along with their interactions. An 8:2 sow-level train/test split was employed, along with grouped 5-fold cross-validation (CV) to prevent data leakage. Model performance, feature importance, and forecasting ability were assessed. All models performed similarly, with

Indexed as

forecastingprecision livestock farmingpredictive modelingtemporal patterns

Identifiers

PMID42621665
PMCPMC13489702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.