ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Recurrent Iris Capture after Iris Suturing following Scleral-Sutured Intraocular Lens Fixation: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Capture of the intraocular lens (IOL) optic by the iris or pupillary margin is defined as iris capture, and this postoperative complication occurs after scleral-sutured IOL fixation and sutureless intrascleral fixation. However, the optimal placement of iris sutures for preventing recurrence has yet to be adequately described. Case Presentation: We report on the case of a 72-year-old man with ocular hypertension 1 year after scleral-sutured IOL fixation in the left eye who was referred for iris capture. Although topical medication was initially used to relieve the iris capture, it later became refractory. Iris suturing was initially performed at the 12 and 6 o'clock positions. However, at 1 month postoperatively, recurrent iris capture was subsequently observed. As a result, a second iris suturing procedure centered at the 8 o'clock position was performed at the documented capture site. In this second iris suturing procedure, which is shown in the online supplementary intraoperative video, an additional suture was placed at the documented 8 o'clock capture site. The clinical course has remained favorable and there has been no recurrence observed. Conclusion: Current results suggest that iris suturing is an effective treatment option for recurrent iris capture after scleral-sutured IOL fixation. Moreover, further recurrence may be prevented by utilizing suture placement guided by the documented site of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.