Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621609›Full record

ArticleSocial problems2026

The Medicalization of Loneliness: Addressing Social Ills through Healthcare.

Sofia Hiltner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social problems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sofia HiltnerDepartment of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

TRAINING IN THE DEMOGRAPHY OF AGINGT32AG000221 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 1992 to 2026
$15.3M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amidst reports on social isolation and loneliness's (SIL) link to poor health and mortality, the former U.S. Surgeon General and others declared SIL a public health priority and encouraged healthcare professionals to act. The medicalization of SIL differs from previous cases because it focuses on a social ill instead of a supposed disease, reflecting concurrent efforts by U.S. government and healthcare organizations to address social determinants of health through healthcare. Drawing on trends in journalistic, medical, and academic publications, content analysis of written materials, and interviews with professionals working on SIL, I examine how researchers, medical professionals, interest groups, government, and healthcare organizations medicalized SIL after 2010. I find that these groups' roles complicate previous narratives of medical imperialism, consumer advocacy, and pharmaceutical greed in medicalization. My findings also shed light on how the medicalization of social ills is made possible by the perceived legitimacy of physical health and the "logical leap" made from the knowledge that a condition affects health to the assumption that it should be addressed through healthcare. Finally, I observed ambivalence about medicalizing SIL, and signs of demedicalization. In my conclusion, I discuss the implications of the medicalization of SIL and social ills more broadly.

Indexed as

lonelinesspolicysocial construction of social problemssocial determinants of healthsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID42621609
PMCPMC13488600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.