ArticleSocial problems2026
The Medicalization of Loneliness: Addressing Social Ills through Healthcare.
Article in Social problems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Amidst reports on social isolation and loneliness's (SIL) link to poor health and mortality, the former U.S. Surgeon General and others declared SIL a public health priority and encouraged healthcare professionals to act. The medicalization of SIL differs from previous cases because it focuses on a social ill instead of a supposed disease, reflecting concurrent efforts by U.S. government and healthcare organizations to address social determinants of health through healthcare. Drawing on trends in journalistic, medical, and academic publications, content analysis of written materials, and interviews with professionals working on SIL, I examine how researchers, medical professionals, interest groups, government, and healthcare organizations medicalized SIL after 2010. I find that these groups' roles complicate previous narratives of medical imperialism, consumer advocacy, and pharmaceutical greed in medicalization. My findings also shed light on how the medicalization of social ills is made possible by the perceived legitimacy of physical health and the "logical leap" made from the knowledge that a condition affects health to the assumption that it should be addressed through healthcare. Finally, I observed ambivalence about medicalizing SIL, and signs of demedicalization. In my conclusion, I discuss the implications of the medicalization of SIL and social ills more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.