Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621595›Full record

ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026

Immediate Facial Reanimation After Radical Parotidectomy for Malignancy: Oncologic Principles and Reconstructive Strategy.

Bo Yin, Jia Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bo YinDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Jia LiuDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review examines immediate facial reanimation after radical parotidectomy for malignancy within an integrated oncologic and reconstructive framework; no formal systematic evidence synthesis or meta-analysis was performed. Radical parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice remains necessary for a subset of primary parotid malignancies and parotid-region metastatic tumors when safe tumor clearance cannot otherwise be achieved. Facial paralysis in this setting compromises ocular protection, oral competence, speech, social interaction, and long-term quality of life and often coexists with soft-tissue loss, contour deformity, and the need for adjuvant therapy. The available evidence remains dominated by retrospective, technique-heterogeneous studies, limiting firm comparative conclusions. Key decisions include when a functioning nerve should be preserved or sacrificed, how reconstruction should be matched to proximal stump availability, distal target integrity, composite defect burden, and anticipated adjuvant treatment, and which outcomes should guide strategy selection. Current evidence, drawn mainly from retrospective oncologic cohorts and indirect facial-reanimation studies, supports several cautious practical inferences. Pretreatment facial weakness and radiologic or intraoperative evidence of nerve involvement remain important adverse features, but absence of weakness does not exclude neural invasion. When oncologically feasible, immediate reanimation is generally favored because it uses the index exposure, preserves access to distal targets, and minimizes denervation time. Direct repair and interposition grafting remain foundational when both nerve ends are available, but contemporary reconstruction increasingly relies on function-specific combinations, including masseteric nerve transfer, selective reinnervation, temporalis-based procedures, and free functional muscle transfer, to address proximal stump loss, prolonged denervation, and composite defects. Anticipated postoperative radiotherapy should not be treated as a default contraindication to immediate repair. Accordingly, current practice favors individualized, function-oriented reconstruction integrated with oncologic management, while future progress depends on standardized multidomain outcomes and stronger comparative evidence.

Indexed as

facial nerve sacrificefacial reanimationfree functional muscle transfermasseteric nerve transferparotid malignancypatient-reported outcomesradical parotidectomyselective reinnervation

Identifiers

PMID42621595
PMCPMC13489053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.