Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621587›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2026

Examining the Effectiveness of Japanese Local and National Government Information Sources on COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake.

Marina Richey, Satoko Yasuno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marina RicheyDepartment of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Satoko YasunoSocio-Informatics, Chuo University, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of different levels of government in generating compliance with public health initiatives during pandemics is not currently known. As public health is administered at both local and national levels, this study aimed to determine which government level is most effective in motivating the public so that resources can be efficiently allocated. Methods: The usage rates and subsequent vaccine uptake of the Japanese national government's main COVID-19 vaccination website, "Vaccine Navi," were compared to Japanese local governments' websites and mailed paper flyers. Data were collected through an online survey of 1088 participants matched to national demographic data asking about their experience with Vaccine Navi and local resources in receiving information about the COVID-19 vaccine. T-tests and ordinary least squares regression modeling were used for statistical analysis. Results: The information resources created by local Japanese governments to aid in vaccine rollout were used significantly more than the national government's Vaccine Navi. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of vaccines received after a local and national information source was used. Conclusions: Local health resources are beneficial to distributing information during health crises, and utilizing local public health offices is advantageous for public health guidance during pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccinefederalismJapanlocal governmentpublic health

Identifiers

PMID42621587
PMCPMC13489563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.