ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Revealing hidden fall accident patterns in Indian construction using association rule mining.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Falls from height are a leading cause of fatalities worldwide, yet the lack of systematic accident data has limited the development of targeted prevention strategies in India. This study aimed to identify patterns and causal factors associated with fatal fall accidents in the Indian construction industry between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2025, using association rule mining. Methods: Owing to the unavailability of official government accident records, 126 fatal fall cases were collected from three major national newspapers. The cases were analyzed using the Apriori algorithm to identify frequent associations among accident-related variables. Strong association rules were evaluated across six consequence categories: causal factors, workers' state of origin, location of fall, occupation, state/region, and age. Results: The analysis generated 148 strong association rules. The absence of fall protection emerged as the dominant causal factor, consistently observed across most accident scenarios. Workers aged 18-25 years, general laborers, and migrant workers from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar were disproportionately represented among fatal fall victims. Scaffold-related and structure-related falls were the most common accident locations and were strongly associated with missing or improperly used fall protection. Maharashtra, Delhi, and Haryana were identified as the highest-risk regions. Conclusion: The findings show that even in data-scarce environments, systematic analysis of publicly available information can provide actionable safety insights. Fall prevention efforts in India should prioritize the provision and proper use of fall protection equipment, focus on young migrant workers and general laborers, strengthen enforcement in high-risk states, and establish a mandatory national accident reporting system to support evidence-based safety policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.