ArticleCureus2026
Zinner Syndrome: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zinner syndrome is an uncommon congenital disorder of the male genitourinary tract that arises from maldevelopment of the distal mesonephric (Wolffian) duct. On the affected side, it combines a seminal vesicle cyst, ejaculatory duct obstruction, and renal agenesis. Because it is frequently asymptomatic, it is often discovered incidentally on cross-sectional imaging. We report the case of a 40-year-old man under oncologic surveillance for treated colonic adenocarcinoma in whom follow-up computed tomography (CT) incidentally revealed a retrovesical cystic lesion of the left seminal vesicle associated with ipsilateral renal agenesis and ectopic insertion of the left ureter into the cyst - a constellation diagnostic of Zinner syndrome. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the reference standard for characterizing seminal vesicle anomalies, CT was sufficient for a confident diagnosis in this characteristic case. The absence of a directly visualized dilated ejaculatory duct did not preclude the diagnosis, as this feature is inconsistently demonstrated on CT and is usually inferred from the associated mesonephric duct anomalies. The syndrome should therefore be suspected in any man in whom a retrovesical cyst coexists with the absence of the ipsilateral kidney, and CT may confirm the diagnosis in characteristic cases even when MRI is unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.