ArticleCureus2026
Atypical Spitz Tumor Versus Dermatofibroma: Two Case Reports Highlighting a Diagnostic Challenge.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spitzoid tumors comprise a heterogeneous spectrum of melanocytic neoplasms, ranging from benign Spitz nevi to malignant Spitzoid melanoma, with atypical Spitz tumor (AST) representing an intermediate entity of uncertain biological potential. AST is a rare melanocytic lesion that may clinically mimic non-melanocytic tumors, particularly dermatofibroma, making accurate diagnosis challenging. It predominantly affects children and young adults and has a predilection for the lower extremities. We describe two cases of young female patients presenting with clinically similar erythematous-pigmented plaques on the thigh. Despite comparable clinical appearances, dermoscopic evaluation revealed distinct patterns that led to different diagnoses: a spitzoid melanocytic proliferation (confirmed as AST on histology) and a dermatofibroma, with markedly divergent biological behaviors and prognostic implications. In spitzoid lesions, the presence of dotted vessels, shiny white streaks, inverse pigment network, and/or brown globules should raise suspicion of a melanocytic spitzoid proliferation. In contrast, the dermatofibroma exhibited a peripheral pigmented network, a central scar-like white area, and brown ringed globules, consistent with the typical dermoscopic pattern of this benign fibrohistiocytic tumor. These observations underscore the value of dermoscopy as a diagnostic triage tool in the assessment of spitzoid lesions. However, definitive diagnosis still relies on histopathological evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.