Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621508›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2026

From the biomedical model to the climate-sensitive model: A necessary adjustment for research ethics committees.

Marie-Geneviève Pinsart, Virginie Pirard, Florence Caeymaex, Katrin Solhdju, Sarah Cunnigham-Burley, Maili C Raven-Adams, Patricio Santillan-Doherty, Michael H Campbell, Lazare Poame, Shamima Lasker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marie-Geneviève PinsartUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 50 Avenue F. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Virginie PirardUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 50 Avenue F. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Florence CaeymaexUniversity of Liège (Ulg), 7 Place du Vingt Août, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Katrin SolhdjuUniversity of Mons (UMons), 20 Place du Parc, 7000 Mons, Belgium.
Sarah Cunnigham-BurleyNuffield Council on Bioethics (NCOB), 100 St. John Street, EC1M 4EH London, United Kingdom.
Maili C Raven-AdamsNuffield Council on Bioethics (NCOB), 100 St. John Street, EC1M 4EH London, United Kingdom.
Patricio Santillan-DohertyNational Bioethics Commission (MNBC), Calzada Arenal 134°, Colonia Arenal Tepepan, CP 1461 Tlalpan, Mexico.
Michael H CampbellThe University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, St. Michael, Barbados; International Institute of Geopsychiatry, Bern, Switzerland.
Lazare PoameAlassane Ouattara University, BP v 18 Bouaké 01, Côte d'Ivoire.
Shamima LaskerBangladesh Bioethics Society (BBS), Mirpur Cantonment, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethics committees are not yet fully integrated into the response to climate change, whether they are national ethics committees (NECs) that issue advisory opinions or research ethics committees (RECs) that review research protocols. This article took this observation as its starting point to consider how ethics committees could support to more accurately assess the consequences of climate change on health, through a lens that focuses on the health of younger and future generations yet within the wider context of ecosystems. From November 2024 to November 2025, the R(

Indexed as

Climate-sensitive modelEthics committeeFuture generationGlobal healthResearchRight to an open future

Identifiers

PMID42621508
PMCPMC13488552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.