ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
MRI-based assessment of fetal brain gyrification: Reliability across two methods.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the reliability of atlas-based assessment of fetal gyrification on MRI, given the absence of a standardized method to assess cerebral gyrification on fetal imaging and the potential of recently published gestational-age specific fetal brain atlases including high-resolution anatomical detail. Materials and methods: Fetal MRI scans (n = 20; gestational age 26 + 0 to 33 + 1 weeks) were retrospectively randomly selected, including 10 healthy controls and 10 cases with early-onset fetal growth restriction, of which 5 were suspected of delayed fetal gyrification based on comparison with an atlas from 2004. Two experienced pediatric neuroradiologists, independently and blinded to clinical condition, assessed each scan using two approaches: (1) a 2D template from the 3D Gholipour atlas, and including measurements of Sylvian fissure angle and Pistorius scoring, and (2) a full 3D atlas-based evaluation. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between radiologists' estimates of GA and the actual GA were above 0.940 for both methods. Inter-rater ICCs were 0.937 for method 1 and 0.932 for method 2. In contrast, ICCs for the Sylvian fissure angle or the Pistorius score for the left and right side were low (0.393, 0.649, 0.098 and 0.131, respectively). Determining delayed gyrification proved challenging, with Cohen's Kappa values between 0.22 and 0.64 between methods and radiologists. Conclusion: Gestational age based on gyrification can be estimated with high reliability, both in agreement with actual GA and between raters, using both 2D and 3D MRI templates from the Gholipour fetal brain atlas. These findings support the reliability of standardized fetal brain templates for assessment of fetal gyrification within this single-center cohort. Reproducibility across centers, scanners and clinical settings remains to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.