ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
Experimental models of osteoarthritis: Advances, limitations and rational selection for translational research.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex degenerative joint disease driven by mechanical overload, inflammation, metabolic disorders, and aging. Despite substantial advances in basic and translational research, no disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) have been approved for clinical use, largely due to the translational gap between preclinical experimental models and clinical practice. Experimental models are essential tools for investigating OA pathophysiology and evaluating therapeutic strategies, among which animal models play an irreplaceable role in recapitulating the in vivo joint environment. This review comprehensively evaluates current OA experimental models, with a focus on animal systems, including surgically induced structural instability, mechanically induced models, chemical induction approaches, metabolism-related models, spontaneous aging models, and genetically modified strains. We assess each model's advantages, limitations, and appropriate applications, clarifying their ability to reflect specific OA subtypes. Moreover, we summarize recent progress in in vitro platforms, ex vivo tissue explants, and emerging technologies such as organ-on-a-chip and organoid models, which provide complementary insights to animal models. This review aims to establish a rational model selection framework aligned with OA pathological features, thereby bridging the preclinical-clinical translational gap and facilitating the development of effective therapeutics. The translational potential of this article: This review systematically evaluates OA experimental models and analyzes their practical utility in translational research of different OA subtypes. It establishes a reasonable framework for model selection and describes how cutting-edge bioengineered platforms complement traditional in vitro and animal studies, providing a reference for improving the predictive reliability of preclinical research and advancing studies on personalized OA therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.