ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Bladder multilithiasis across different clinical scenarios: Multimodality imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and complication assessment in 4 patients.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder calculi are an uncommon form of urolithiasis in developed countries and are usually associated with urinary stasis, bladder outlet obstruction, chronic catheterization, recurrent urinary tract infections, and neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Although their diagnosis is often straightforward, bladder multilithiasis may present across heterogeneous clinical scenarios, ranging from uncomplicated intravesical stones to advanced neglected disease with obstructive complications. Imaging may also be relevant for differential diagnosis when intravesical calcified lesions or bladder wall calcifications are considered. We present a retrospective multimodality imaging case series of 4 male patients (68-80 years) with bladder multilithiasis evaluated with ultrasound, radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Three patients underwent ultrasound as the first-line examination, demonstrating multiple dependent echogenic intravesical foci with posterior acoustic shadowing. CT was particularly valuable in the most advanced case, where massive bladder multilithiasis was associated with severe bilateral hydronephrosis, hydroureter, delayed urinary excretion, renal cortical thinning, and perivesical inflammatory changes. MRI, although not routinely used for stone detection, provided useful incidental anatomical correlation by showing persistent intravesical signal voids across multiple sequences. This case series highlights that the radiologic relevance of bladder multilithiasis extends beyond simple stone detection. Ultrasound remains a first-line modality, whereas CT is essential for evaluating stone obstructive complications. MRI has no primary role in routine stone work-up but may provide complementary information in selected pelvic examinations. Familiarity with imaging patterns, complication signs, and differential diagnoses may improve diagnostic confidence and support appropriate management, particularly in elderly or vulnerable patients with delayed presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.