ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
The applications, complications, and management of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (n-PICCs): a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (n-PICCs) is a commonly used vascular access device in neonatal intensive care, yet its associated complications significantly affect patient outcomes. This narrative review aims to summarize current status of n-PICCs, major complications and risk factors, and evidence-based preventive strategies. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for articles published between January 2000 and February 2026, and relevant studies were synthesized and discussed. The findings demonstrate that the incidence of n-PICCs-related complications ranges from 10% to 40%, encompassing catheter-related bloodstream infection, thrombosis, cardiac tamponade, and mechanical failure. Key risk factors include low birth weight, small gestational age, prolonged catheter dwell time, malposition of the catheter tip, and improper insertion site selection. In terms of preventive strategies, interventions such as ultrasound guidance, intracavitary electrocardiography, antimicrobial-impregnated catheters, tissue adhesive securement, and bundle care strategies have been associated with reductions in specific complications in observational and quasi-experimental studies, although the evidence quality varies, while specialized vascular access teams and standardized training serve as important foundations for ensuring procedural quality and patient safety. Based on these findings, this review proposes that neonatal vascular access management should shift from single-intervention approaches toward system-based frameworks. Integrating technical optimization, material selection, standardized procedures, and organizational management into a comprehensive safety system covering the full process-assessment, insertion, maintenance, removal, and monitoring-represents a key pathway for reducing complications and ensuring patient safety. Future research should focus on multicenter randomized controlled trials, improving risk prediction models, and advancing the clinical application of intelligent monitoring technologies and evidence-based practice dissemination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.