Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Beyond behavior: a neurocognitive agenda for investigating the neural underpinnings of successful high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in adults.

Szu-Han Kay Chen, Marisa Nagano, Laura M Gonnerman, Hsinyi Tanya Liu, Erin L Meier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Szu-Han Kay ChenDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States.
Marisa NaganoDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States.
Laura M GonnermanDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States.
Hsinyi Tanya LiuDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, United States.
Erin L MeierDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Research has shown that augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) has the potential to function not only as a compensatory communicative strategy, but also as a tool to facilitate language recovery for people with aphasia. However, much work remains in order to understand the brain changes associated with AAC-driven recovery. The purpose of this article is to highlight the need for neurological research on high-technology AAC use, and to advance that research agenda by proposing the Transformation of Representation Across Neurocognitive Systems for Concept to External Navigation and Display (TRANSCEND) framework, a testable model of language production for people with aphasia who use AAC. We also argue for fNIRS as a promising neuroimaging tool that offers the advantage of allowing ecologically valid AAC use during experimental tasks. Conclusion: The TRANSCEND framework, a dual-route neurological model that begins with concept retrieval and leads to either verbal or AAC output, provides a foundation for future research that teases apart the neural underpinnings of motor, speech, and language aspects of AAC use.

Indexed as

AACaphasiafNIRSspoken languagetreatment

Identifiers

PMID42621274
PMCPMC13487502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.