ArticleiScience2026
Global land-use change rivals climate change in driving projected diversity shifts of terrestrial vertebrates.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate under the combined pressures of climate and land-use change, yet their relative contributions and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we developed a filtering-energy-stress framework to characterize multidimensional land-use change and integrate it, together with climate change, into species distribution models for projecting future biodiversity dynamics under shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs). We found that 68.14% of terrestrial land was projected to experience richness declines by 2100, with land-use change contributing 47.94% of total changes, comparable to climate change (52.06%). The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that available energy was the most influential land-use dimension across vertebrate taxa, outperforming habitat suitability and land-use intensity. These findings underscore the importance of considering multiple ecological dimensions of land-use change beyond land-cover categories and provide a mechanistic framework for disentangling climate and land-use impacts to inform integrated conservation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.