ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of lumbar decompression and fusion with a novel metal-free cortico-pedicular fixation device: A comparative cohort study.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is ongoing interest in less invasive fixation strategies for lumbar fusion that can achieve comparable biomechanical stability and patient outcomes to traditional pedicle screws. The purpose of this study was to compare the novel metal-free polyether ether ketone cortico-pedicular fixation device (Karma Fixation System; Spinal Elements) with conventional pedicle screw fixation in the largest clinical series reported to date. Methods: This retrospective comparative cohort study included 20 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar fusion with the cortico-pedicular fixation device and 20 consecutive controls treated with conventional pedicle screw fixation. Outcome measures included same-level reoperation rate within 12 months, radiographic fusion assessed on computed tomography, and patient-reported outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale for back and leg pain) at 12 months. Results: In the cortico-pedicular fixation group, 5 patients (25%) required reoperation with pedicle screw fixation for pseudarthrosis and recurrent symptoms at a mean of 7.6 months (reoperation rate at L2-L3 was 50%). Among patients with computed tomography imaging at ≥6 months (range 6-17 months), fusion was observed in only 3 of 16 assessable levels (18.8%), with inferior articular process fractures identified in 9 levels. In the control group, no structural reoperations were required, and posterolateral fusion was achieved in 10 of 11 assessable levels (91%). After excluding cases requiring revision, there were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes between groups. Conclusions: The cortico-pedicular device demonstrated high rates of pseudarthrosis and inferior articular process fractures. Its use in conjunction with open laminectomy may be inadvisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.