ArticleSAGE open nursing
Nursing Process Documentation and Use of Standardized Nursing Terminology (NANDA-I, NOC, NIC) in Undergraduate Nursing Students: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The nursing process (NP) is a framework for planning and documenting nursing care. Standardized nursing language (SNL), including NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, supports consistent documentation and demonstrates nursing contributions to patient outcomes. Understanding students' use of NP and SNL is important for improving nursing education and care quality. Objectives: This study evaluated the quality of undergraduate nursing students' NP documentation, including the use of NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, and explored perceived barriers to implementing NP and SNL in clinical practice. Methods: This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted in 2024 at a Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. In the quantitative phase, NP documentation in Pediatric Nursing clinical logbooks, completed after a 17-hour case-based course on NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC, was evaluated using a researcher-developed checklist. Nursing diagnoses were classified according to NANDA-I Taxonomy II domains, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS version 29. In the qualitative phase, purposively selected students participated in semi-structured interviews to explain the quantitative findings. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis based on Graneheim and Lundman's approach. Results: A total of 121 clinical logbooks were analyzed. The mean NP documentation score was 3.52 ± 1.05 (out of 5). Students performed best in documenting NIC interventions and lowest in documenting NANDA-I diagnoses and NOC outcomes. Among 633 documented diagnoses, Safety/Protection, Elimination and Exchange, and Nutrition were the most frequent domains, whereas Self-Perception was least represented; no diagnoses were recorded in the Sexuality, Life Principles, or Growth and Development domains. Eighteen students participated in interviews, yielding two themes: education-related and student-related barriers. Conclusion: Students demonstrated greater proficiency in documenting interventions than in formulating standardized diagnoses and outcomes. The predominance of physiological diagnoses suggests limitations in comprehensive assessment. Strengthening diagnostic and outcome reasoning and promoting holistic NP-based care should be emphasized in nursing education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.