ArticleDigital health
TextRank-based healthcare big data analysis system for text network analysis and trend phase identification.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The demand for scalable healthcare knowledge extraction is increasing. To address this demand, this study developed a TextRank-based big data analysis system focused on reusable, system-level implementation for the automation of keyword extraction, text network analysis, and trend phase identification from large-scale textual data. Methods: The proposed system was developed based on a system engineering framework that included requirement analysis, modular architecture design, and system implementation. Healthcare-related textual documents were collected and preprocessed using domain-specific normalisation and noise-reduction procedures. Keywords were extracted using a graph-based TextRank algorithm, and weighted keyword co-occurrence networks were constructed for each analysis period. Trend phase identification was performed by calculating the weighted Jaccard similarity between consecutive periods and detecting structural changes in keyword distributions. All analytical components were integrated into an end-to-end healthcare big data analysis system with interactive visualisation capabilities. Results: The proposed system successfully extracted representative keywords, constructed keyword co-occurrence networks, and identified distinct trend phases reflecting changes in healthcare research topics over time. The system automated the analytical workflow from keyword extraction to trend phase identification and provided visualizations to support the exploration and interpretation of healthcare research trends. Conclusion: The results confirmed that the proposed system provides a scalable, interpretable, and reusable platform for continuous healthcare knowledge monitoring, supporting data-driven research, policy formulation, and strategic decision-making. The automated functions of the system thereby enable researchers to efficiently monitor evolving healthcare topics and discover meaningful insights over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.