ArticleJournal of exercise science and fitness2026
Effect of motor competence-based intervention on physical activity and physical fitness in children aged 3-6 years at risk for developmental coordination disorder.
Article in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Poor motor competence (MC) is a core feature of young children at risk for developmental coordination disorder (DCD), often limiting participation in physical activity (PA) and negatively affecting physical fitness (PF). Although MC improvement is recognized as effective for promoting PA and PF in typically developing children, its effects in young children at risk for DCD (rDCD) remain unclear. Objective: To investigate the outcomes of MC intervention on MC, PA, and PF in young children with rDCD. Methods: Twenty-six children with rDCD (Mage = 4.64 years) were quasi-randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 12, 10 boys) or a control group (n = 14, 10 boys). The experimental group received an MC intervention that incorporated stability demands within task-specific contexts and progressively integrated locomotor and object control skills. The control group received sensory integration training. Both groups participated in 40-min, one-to-one sessions three times per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was overall MC, as assessed using the total score of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2). All outcomes were assessed at baseline and after intervention. Data were analyzed using two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: After the 12-week intervention, overall MC was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (mean difference = 12.98, Conclusions: A tailored motor competence intervention was associated with short-term improvements in overall motor competence, weekday MVPA, and overall PF in young children with rDCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.