ReviewiScience2026
The role of FGFR signaling in SCLC and NSCLC: Current insights and therapeutic perspectives.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide and is characterized by marked biological heterogeneity and frequent therapeutic failure. Although lung cancer is broadly classified into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on distinct cellular origins and clinical behaviors, both entities rely on aberrant signaling networks to sustain tumor growth and disease progression. Despite advances in biomarker guided therapeutic strategies, approaches centered on individual genetic alterations have shown limited durability, in part due to tumor evolution and cellular plasticity. Among signaling pathways shared across lung cancer subtypes, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling has been implicated in regulating tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, and adaptive responses to therapy. Here, we argue that the limited clinical success of FGFR-targeted therapies in lung cancer reflects constraints of alteration-centered targeting rather than an absence of biological relevance. We propose that FGFR signaling functions as a context-dependent adaptive node, whose therapeutic significance emerges under selective pressure and acquired resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.