ArticleiScience2026
Integrating environmental, economic, and technological assessments for modified biochar materials in complex contaminated soil remediation.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analysis were integrated to evaluate four modified biochars (acid/base-modified, magnetically modified, nano-modified, and organically modified) for complex, contaminated soil remediation. LCA ranked modified biochars in term of environmental impacts as follows: organic > nano > acid/base > magnetic. LCC analysis ranked biochars in terms of total costs as nano > organic > magnetic > acid/base. In physicochemical improvement, biochars ranked as magnetic > nano > organic > acid/base. Comprehensive assessment recommends acid/base-modified biochar for agricultural pollution, magnetically modified biochar for industrial sites (due to high adsorption and recyclability), organically modified biochar for domestic waste dumping areas, while nano-modified biochar is not primarily recommended owing to high cost and performance variability. The findings support decision-making by balancing environmental friendliness, cost effectiveness, and material properties across different contamination scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.