Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621128›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Orbitofrontal cortex contributes to context-dependent timing under ambiguity.

Gabrielle Marmur, Haneen Rajabi, John Schwarcz, Robert Reiner, Jonathan Kadmon, Eran Lottem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabrielle MarmurEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Haneen RajabiEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
John SchwarczEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Robert ReinerEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Jonathan KadmonEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eran LottemEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive decision-making requires flexibly adjusting the decision process when stimulus reliability changes. Most paradigms manipulate reliability by changing stimulus properties, whereas animals often face situations in which the physical inputs are unchanged but their informativeness varies. To address this, we designed a change-detection task in which the reward-predictive reliability of auditory cues varied across blocks while the cues themselves remained unchanged. Mice adjusted their waiting time accordingly, responding later when cues were less reliable. Importantly, these adjustments reflected sensitivity to the underlying sound statistics, rather than reliance solely on reward feedback. Inactivation of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) reduced this timing modulation. Modeling captured this effect as reduced context-dependent modulation of accumulation dynamics, accompanied by increased lapse-like responding. These findings suggest that OFC contributes to maintaining context-dependent timing under ambiguity and establish a tractable framework for studying flexible behavioral adjustment to changing cue statistics.

Indexed as

auditory change detectiondecision makingevidence accumulationflexible timingorbitofrontal cortexresponse timing

Identifiers

PMID42621128
PMCPMC13486877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.