ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
Interpretable machine-learning for depression classification based on a three-component EEG marker.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG)-based depression classification requires interpretable machine-learning approaches and validation strategies that avoid subject-level information leakage. This single-center pilot study developed and internally evaluated a marker-based interpretable machine-learning framework using eight-channel resting-state EEG. After quality control, 48 participants were included, comprising 23 clinician-diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) patients recruited at Zhejiang Provincial Tongde Hospital and 25 healthy controls (HCs). Subject-level spectral, entropy/complexity, asymmetry, and coherence-based connectivity features were extracted from pre-processed EEG epochs. Exploratory feature analysis was used to define a three-component EEG marker comprising fronto-posterior beta- and gamma-band coherence heterogeneity and F8-F7 beta-band asymmetry variability. The resulting marker was evaluated using classical classifiers under strict subject-wise leave-one-subject-out validation and compared with EEGNet and 1D-CNN baselines under the same subject-wise protocol. Among the evaluated classical models, RBF-SVM achieved the highest subject-level discrimination in the primary native-reference 2-s analysis, with an AUC of 0.910, accuracy of 85.42%, sensitivity of 82.61%, and specificity of 88.00%. The primary result used the native A1/A2 acquisition reference and non-overlapping 2-s epochs, consistent with segmentation used in previous resting-state EEG depression studies. SHAP analysis indicated that fronto-posterior gamma-band coherence heterogeneity and F8-F7 beta-band asymmetry variability were the dominant contributors to the RBF-SVM decision function. These findings support the exploratory value of compact EEG markers for interpretable internal discrimination in data-limited eight-channel settings and motivate validation in independent external cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.