ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Tislelizumab combined with Anti-GD2 antibody-based chemoimmunotherapy for pediatric relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: a two-Case Report.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroblastoma (NB) is one of the most common extracranial solid tumors in children. Patients with high-risk metastatic disease remain at substantial risk of relapse and have poor long-term outcomes. No standard salvage regimen has been established for relapsed/refractory (R/R) NB, and the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in pediatric NB remains investigational. Here, we report two pediatric patients with R/R high-risk NB who received a tislelizumab-containing multi-agent regimen consisting of tislelizumab, an anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody, GM-CSF support, and sequential mICE/VIT chemotherapy. The anti-GD2 antibody, dinutuximab beta or naxitamab, was selected according to each patient's insurance coverage. Both patients tolerated treatment well, and no severe immune-related adverse events were observed during the reported follow-up period. After four cycles of combination therapy, Patient 1 showed marked regression of soft-tissue lesions and clearance of bone marrow involvement. Patient 2 achieved a complete response and remained disease-free during the 5-month follow-up period after treatment completion. However, the durability of this response remains uncertain because of the limited follow-up duration. These preliminary short-term observations suggest that this multi-agent regimen may be a feasible salvage approach for selected pediatric patients with R/R high-risk NB. However, the durability of these antitumor responses cannot be confirmed given the limited surveillance period. Notably, this retrospective two-case observation cannot distinguish the independent antitumor contribution of tislelizumab alone, as multiple therapeutic components were administered simultaneously without control groups to isolate single-agent efficacy. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.