Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621031›Full record

ArticleBioscience2026

A practical framework for identifying genetic subpopulations and ESUs: Insights for IUCN assessments and broader management.

Julia C Geue, Laura D Bertola, Paulette Bloomer, Anna Brüniche-Olsen, Jessica M da Silva, J Andrew DeWoody, Ancuta Fedorca, José A Godoy, Catherine E Grueber, Margaret E Hunter and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Julia C GeueWildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-8614
Laura D BertolaDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3445-0355
Paulette BloomerMolecular Ecology and Evolution Programme, Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6357-0153
Anna Brüniche-OlsenCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3364-2064
Jessica M da SilvaSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, 7735 Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-1166
J Andrew DeWoodyDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources and Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7315-5631
Ancuta FedorcaDepartment of Wildlife, National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry "Marin Dracea,"  500040 Brasov, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-5422
José A GodoyEstación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, 41092 Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7502-9471
Catherine E GrueberSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8179-1822
Margaret E HunterU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Gainesville, FL 32653, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-9302
Christina HvilsomSection for Hologenomics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-6888
Evelyn L JensenSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE14LB, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1819-3117
Alexander KopatzNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, 7034 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9139-1179
Anna J MacDonaldAustralian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, TAS 7050, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2972-200X
Silvia Pérez-EsponaRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Rosline Institute, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7098-4904
Antoinette J PiaggioNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80521, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4701-0746
Jennifer PiersonAustralian Wildlife Conservancy, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4140-010X
Isa-Rita M RussoSchool of Biosciences, Sir Martin Evans Building, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF103AX, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9504-3633
Helen SennRoyal Zoological Society of Scotland, Edinburgh Zoo and Highland Wildlife Park, Edinburgh EH12 6TS, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3711-8753
Gernot SegelbacherWildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8024-7008
Paul SunnucksWildlife Genetic Management Group, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8139-7059
Cock van OosterhoutSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR47TJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5653-738X
Deborah M LeighLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3902-2568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species conservation assessments evaluate extinction risk, and recovery potential, advancing species persistence through guiding resource prioritization and planning. Assessment frameworks, including the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List and Green Status of Species, typically focus on species as a whole. Importantly, they do not routinely account for genetically distinct units or do not have standardized methods of unit delineation. This limits the representation of genetically distinct components, including adaptive genetic diversity that underpins long-term resilience and recovery. Incorporating standardized within-species units like subpopulations and Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs) into species assessments could help address this oversight. However, identifying and delineating such units remain challenging, particularly when molecular data are limited. Here, we propose a flexible framework that integrates molecular and non-molecular evidence to identify both subpopulations and ESUs across taxa, providing a practical tool to incorporate within-species diversity into conservation assessments.

Indexed as

conservation policyEvolutionarily Significant Unitgenetic diversityIUCN species assessmentssubpopulations

Identifiers

PMID42621031
PMCPMC13485999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.