ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Perceived safety and trust shape transgender and gender diverse participation in exercise science: a consensual qualitative research study.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Transgender and gender diverse people are substantially underrepresented in exercise science research. This limits the inclusivity and generalizability of evidence guiding exercise, physical activity, and physical rehabilitation practices. While prior health research has examined barriers and facilitators to transgender and gender diverse participation, little is known about how transgender and gender diverse individuals perceive exercise science research specifically. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore factors that may influence transgender and gender diverse individuals' willingness to participate in exercise science research. Methods: Using a Consensual Qualitative Research approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 transgender and gender diverse adults recruited via LGBTQIA2S+ university and community organizations in the United States. Data were analyzed via Consensual Qualitative Research methods to identify domains, categories, and subcategories reflecting shared topics and patterns in responses across participants. Results: Three primary domains emerged: research participation, researcher decisions and behaviors, and safety. Participants described their willingness to participate as influenced by study design features, information clarity, and perceived benefits. Trust in researchers and institutions, inclusive recruitment procedures, and communication were also key facilitators of participation. Barriers included invasive study procedures, exclusionary eligibility criteria, ambiguous recruitment materials, and concerns about gender misclassification or misuse of data. Across domains, perceptions of political, physical, and psychosocial safety served as a central concern through which participants evaluated research opportunities. Participants emphasized that respectful communication, inclusive research practices, privacy protections, and culturally competent researchers were essential for safe and affirming research environments. Discussion: Our findings highlight the importance of intentional inclusivity in exercise science research design and recruitment. Implementing transparent communication, community-engaged recruitment, inclusive practices, and trauma-informed procedures may improve participation and representation of transgender and gender diverse individuals in exercise science research. Enhancing inclusion may address ethical responsibilities and strengthen the scientific validity and applicability of exercise science evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.