Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620979›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Phase-aware adaptation for functional group recognition from condensed-phase infrared spectra.

Yitian Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yitian KongDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Barbara USA yitiankong@ucsb.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2933-7819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infrared (IR) spectroscopy is widely used for functional group identification, but machine-learning models often struggle when spectra are transferred across physical phases. Here we establish a phase-separated 16-label benchmark for functional group recognition across gas, liquid, and solid IR spectra and show that direct gas-to-condensed transfer is unreliable, especially for solid spectra. Simply increasing model capacity or replacing the backbone provides only limited improvement. In contrast, the main two-stage gas-pretrained adaptation protocol substantially improves condensed-phase recognition over target-only training, raising solid Macro-F1 from 0.6902 to 0.7351 and liquid Macro-F1 from 0.7198 to 0.7792. The improvement is class-dependent, with strong recovery for labels such as nitrile, while alkene remains difficult because of weak and overlapping spectral evidence. Additional analyses show that the adaptation benefit is not explained by longer target-only training or class weighting, and that it transfers across multiple model families. To make the adapted model more suitable for resource-limited use, we applied segment max pooling under the two-stage gas-pretrained adaptation pipeline, reducing the model to 9.23% of the original Dual Head parameter count while retaining 99.04% of its Macro-F1 performance. Together, this work establishes a phase-aware adaptation framework for condensed-phase IR functional group recognition, showing that gas-phase spectra can be converted from an unreliable direct predictor into useful prior training data for solid and liquid spectra.

Identifiers

PMID42620979
PMCPMC13487535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.