Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620954›Full record

ReviewBioscience2026

Agency, goal directedness, and the levels of biological organization.

Pierrick Bourrat, Andrew B Barron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierrick BourratSchool of Humanities, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4465-6015
Andrew B BarronSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life and evolution often appear purposeful, but goals and purpose are not parts of reductionist sciences (e.g., modern physics, chemistry). This contradiction has been an enduring conundrum. Traditionally, explanations that invoke goal directedness and agency have been treated cautiously, but a new move argues that we should recognize multiple levels of biological organization-cells, tissues, and organisms-as agents with agendas. In the present article, we offer clarity on when and why the concept of goal directedness is applicable in biology. We offer grounds for distinguishing whether something is a candidate for goal directedness, and we consider whether explanations involving goal directedness (teleonomic explanations) are useful. Teleonomic explanations can be briefer and less computationally demanding than algorithmic explanations, and they can help pose hypotheses for how something might function. However, they risk omitting critical details and misdirecting conclusions. Therefore, although there is a place for goal-directed explanations in biology, they should be used with care.

Indexed as

basal cognitionbiological agentpurposeteleologyteleonomy

Identifiers

PMID42620954
PMCPMC13486002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.