Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620891›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Astrocytes mobilize a broader repertoire of lysosomal repair mechanisms than neurons.

Erin M Smith, Natali L Chanaday, Sandra Maday

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erin M SmithDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Natali L ChanadayDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Sandra MadayDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

Defining the roles and regulation of neuronal autophagyR01NS110716 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MADAY, SANDRA L. · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Astrocyte-neuron regulation of autophagy and lysosomal pathways in proteotoxic stress associated with alpha-synucleinopathiesR21AG088697 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MADAY, SANDRA L. · 2024 to 2025
$434k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG088697NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lysosomal damage impairs proteostasis and contributes to neurodegenerative diseases, yet cell-type-specific differences in lysosomal repair remain unclear. Using a neuron-astrocyte coculture system, we compared responses to lysosomal injury induced by a lysosomotropic methyl ester. Both neurons and astrocytes showed lysosomal damage, marked by Galectin-3 recruitment to lumenal lysosomal β-galactosides, disrupted lysosomal pH, and engagement of lysophagy receptors TAX1BP1 and p62. However, astrocytes showed a preferential recruitment of ESCRT (endosomal sorting complex required for transport) repair machinery to damaged lysosomes. Additionally, the lysosomal membrane reformation pathway regulated by the RAB7-GTPase-activating protein (GAP), TBC1D15, was more robustly activated in astrocytes. By contrast, the phosphoinositide-initiated membrane tethering and lipid transport (PITT) pathway, mediating lipid transfer between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and damaged lysosomes, was engaged in both cell types. Our data reveal a divergence in how neurons and astrocytes mobilize repair pathways to manage lysosomal damage. These data may reflect differences in lysosomal resilience between astrocytes and neurons and inform therapeutic strategies to correct lysosomal dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

astrocyteESCRTLLOMelysosomal damageneuronORP9PI4K2ATBC1D15

Identifiers

PMID42620891
PMCPMC13487023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.