Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620889›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026

Longitudinal Knowledge Assessment as a driver for learning: insights from a nationwide survey of endocrinologists.

Bradley Michael Gray, Junhui Qian, Weifeng Weng, Benjamin Jacob Chesluk, Brendan Joel Barnhart, Rebecca Sue Lipner, Rozalina Grubina McCoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bradley Michael GrayAssessment and Research Department, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8979-019X
Junhui QianAssessment and Research Department, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.
Weifeng WengAssessment and Research Department, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7323-1182
Benjamin Jacob CheslukAssessment and Research Department, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8097-1573
Brendan Joel BarnhartAssessment and Research Department, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.
Rebecca Sue LipnerAssessment and Research Department, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-1744
Rozalina Grubina McCoyDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2289-3183

Funding

Program Development (Pilot) Core (Core B)P30AG097158 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Stephen B. Thomas · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG097158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) started offering the Longitudinal Knowledge Assessment (LKA) to endocrinologists as a 10-year Maintenance of Certification alternative in 2022. Participants answer 30 open-book online questions quarterly, receive real-time question-specific feedback and overall feedback via progress reports starting in year 2, and are assessed for competency every 5 years. Objective: To examine whether the LKA encouraged learning, motivated further study, and/or changed patient care. Design: We surveyed endocrinologists in 2024 who started LKA in 2022-2024 about their learning, study motivated by progress report feedback, patient care changes, and changes in the use of information resources. Results were weighted for nonresponse. Setting: Mid-career endocrinologists. Intervention: ABIM's LKA. Main outcomes: Reports of learning, motivated study, and patient care changes. Results: We surveyed 1649 endocrinologists, of whom 1015 responded to the survey (62% response). Overall, 95% of respondents reported learning while answering questions. Of those viewing their progress reports, 68% reported that they were motivated to study by the feedback. Motivated study was 17 percentage points greater for physicians with bottom vs top quartile first progress report preliminary scores. Additionally, 53% of physicians reported that LKA participation resulted in changes or planned changes to patient care. These reports were about 30 percentage points greater among physicians reporting that participation led to changes in the use of information resources, learning broader than question level, learning from question references, and study motivated by progress report feedback. Conclusion: Endocrinologists' LKA participation resulted in self-reports of patient care changes, broad learning, and motivated study.

Indexed as

board certificationclinical practice changecontinuing medical educationlongitudinal knowledge assessmentmaintenance of certificationphysician learning

Identifiers

PMID42620889
PMCPMC13487333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.