ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
Longitudinal Knowledge Assessment as a driver for learning: insights from a nationwide survey of endocrinologists.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Knowledge Assessment as a driver for learning: insights from a nationwide survey of endocrinologists.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Context: The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) started offering the Longitudinal Knowledge Assessment (LKA) to endocrinologists as a 10-year Maintenance of Certification alternative in 2022. Participants answer 30 open-book online questions quarterly, receive real-time question-specific feedback and overall feedback via progress reports starting in year 2, and are assessed for competency every 5 years. Objective: To examine whether the LKA encouraged learning, motivated further study, and/or changed patient care. Design: We surveyed endocrinologists in 2024 who started LKA in 2022-2024 about their learning, study motivated by progress report feedback, patient care changes, and changes in the use of information resources. Results were weighted for nonresponse. Setting: Mid-career endocrinologists. Intervention: ABIM's LKA. Main outcomes: Reports of learning, motivated study, and patient care changes. Results: We surveyed 1649 endocrinologists, of whom 1015 responded to the survey (62% response). Overall, 95% of respondents reported learning while answering questions. Of those viewing their progress reports, 68% reported that they were motivated to study by the feedback. Motivated study was 17 percentage points greater for physicians with bottom vs top quartile first progress report preliminary scores. Additionally, 53% of physicians reported that LKA participation resulted in changes or planned changes to patient care. These reports were about 30 percentage points greater among physicians reporting that participation led to changes in the use of information resources, learning broader than question level, learning from question references, and study motivated by progress report feedback. Conclusion: Endocrinologists' LKA participation resulted in self-reports of patient care changes, broad learning, and motivated study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.