ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Identification of modifiable gait parameters predictive of simulated tibial stress-fracture risk in men and women.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This exploratory study investigated the ability of biomechanical gait parameters to predict and stratify simulated tibial stress-fracture (SF) risk in young, healthy adults. Methods: We analyzed 30 modifiable gait parameters (both kinematic and kinetic) for 21 men and 20 women when they ran with external loads (0, 11.3, or 22.7 kg) and the associated tibial SF risks during a simulated 10-week basic combat training in the U.S. military. To identify informative parameters and predict SF risk of the tibia, we separately developed personalized linear mixed-effects models for men and women. To stratify the SF risk, we developed logistic regression (LR) models. Results: Out of all the 30 parameters, ankle joint reaction force was the most predictive for both men and women, followed by hip external rotation angle for men and hip adduction moment for women. Using these parameters, LR models yielded area under the curve values of 0.81-0.95. For kinematic parameters alone, ankle dorsiflexion angle was the most predictive for both men and women, followed by hip external rotation angle for men and hip flexion angle for women. The associated LR models yielded reasonable performance for women (0.72-0.82) but weaker performance for men (0.53-0.71). Conclusion: We identified modifiable gait parameters predictive of simulated tibial SF risk in men and women and developed models based on kinematic and kinetic parameters that adequately predicted at-risk individuals. In the future, upon independent validation, this work has the potential to help identify recruits who may benefit from individualized training regimens and proactive interventions to reduce injury risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.